SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (37880)11/15/2000 6:47:54 PM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
why is GE having so much trouble hanging above its 200 dma.... hmmmm???



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (37880)11/15/2000 6:56:09 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Actually, I've seen several articles that referenced studies of voter competence. It's very clear that democrats screw up in the voting process by a consistent 1-2% higher rate than republicans. Darwinism in action, i think.

>the argument went that errors shouldn't favor one side statistically
>speaking, something that seems eminently logical without going into more
>detail.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (37880)11/15/2000 10:29:32 PM
From: s-words  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<< something that seems eminently logical without going into more detail>> I don't think so. The larger the sample, the closer the voting ratio of the ballots disallowed for containing errors will approach the ratio of the overall vote, all else being equal.