Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (3303)	11/15/2000 7:13:49 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5582

Of course I read it, although it was easier to read before you used the bold font. Do you see any relation to Gum Tech there? It says "...failed to adequately supervise a former registered representative..." It is doubtful that the case has anything to do with trades in GUMM because their GUMM representative is still there. You do know what "former" means, right? Just curious, are you going to sell all stocks that you own in which DLJ is a market maker? At any rate, even if that fine did have something to do with trades that SSEC made in GUMM, it would have no reflection on the company or their business. Do you own a calculator? Do you know how to use it? Does your wife know that you are wasting time posting useless information on the Internet?