Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: If only I'd held who wrote (62739)	11/15/2000 7:50:24 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I commend you for the great research. There really is nothing I can add to that other than investing in COVD is an investment in DSL....do you believe in the technology or not. I seriously doubt the stock shall get close to penny status. I already have it set via stops IF the stock breaches my average cost in the upper-mid 3's. Jane

To: If only I'd held who wrote (62739)	11/15/2000 7:57:50 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I second that. Even if the technology is compelling, the way the company did its business earns the stocks a high turd with flies rating.... I'm still astonished that they got away with the stock trading.... weeks if not months after the Q they come up with additional potential defaults & reduce their meager revenue. Nasdaq could have halted the stock or auditors express that they do not rely any more. This actually happened in similar cases. At least, as an investor I could no longer rely on their releases & filings... Who says that there isn't perhaps more under the surface....even a honest counterparty can decide easily not to pay anymore. JMO as ever, no solicit to buy, sell short, tear, drop, burn etc... you know.