Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (76988)	11/15/2000 9:51:03 PM
From: holdin_long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

That doesn't address everyone who didn't vote based on the media calling Fl early..... I would prefer a complete Fl revote instead of a complete manual recount. But that seems unrealistic too.....

To: American Spirit who wrote (76988)	11/15/2000 9:51:05 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yeah, I've heard the talking points. Let me ask you this. Which chad should we count, the pregnant chad, the semi-pregnant chad, the half torn chad, the partial torn chad, the dented chad, the scratched chad, the dirty fingernail chad, the creased chad, the chad with a fingerprint on it, or the chad which is nearest to Al Gore??

To: American Spirit who wrote (76988)	11/15/2000 9:57:31 PM
From: Frank Griffin	Respond to of 769667

I completely disagree with that. We have a consistent method of counting that was known before the election and the method should not be changed after the fact. Gore is simply trying to figure a way to manipulate the election to win. Machines are far more honest in their count than partisan democrats would be.