Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (77272)	11/15/2000 11:43:19 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Respond to of 769667

AS You guys have to give back the "Votamatics" before you're caught. abcnews.go.com

To: American Spirit who wrote (77272)	11/15/2000 11:56:13 PM
From: Carl R.	Respond to of 769667

...and of course the Palm Beach board will continue to "count" ballots until Gore has enough votes to claim to be the winner. But why would anyone believe that count is accurate? No doubt the Florida Supreme court will ultimately order it to be used, but which count is really accurate? The impartial machine count? Or the subjective manual recount? Is there fraud going on in the re-count? Or will it really be a more accurate interpretation of the voters' intent? Was there fraud going on in the initial recount? Why did some counties end up with more ballots than certified voters after the first re-count? One thing is sure, and that is that whoever wins will be deemed by the public to have stolen the election. Neither party can win anymore. Everyone I know wouldn't vote for either man again. Carl