SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (2344)11/16/2000 1:10:38 AM
From: TraderGreg  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6710
 
good point, I will concede that...in fact, I'll go one step further and tell you that she probably made her decision earlier...before she ever even received a memo from any of those counties. And then at the end of her speech, she wants to reassure everyone that her actions were impartial and consistent with FL law. She then said "God bless". I guess that was supposed to make everyone feel better.

Look, to a neutral observer, Ms. Harris is clearly acting in a fashion that gives the appearance of partisanship. Unlike Jeb, recusal is a word that is clearly not in her repertoire as a human being. Even Ed Rollins, architect of Reagan's 49 state landslide win, acknowledges that her actions clearly show her bias. Personally, when I am getting screwed, I like it to feel good, which right now, it doesn't.

I will continue to plead the case that unless time delays in receipt of revised votes severely impact on the pre-ordained time schedule of selecting electors(12/12), meeting of electors(12/18), and counting of electoral votes by the Congress(1/6), then a decision to reject those revised vote totals, prior to any and all of the aforementioned dates, can be construed as arbitrary. Now, I sure ain't a lawyer, but I think a judge(s) just might agree with me, especially if those vote totals are determined within the framework of existing FL law.

TG