Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirRealist who wrote (41478)	11/16/2000 8:44:39 AM
From: JLS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Anyone know these analysts? They come from smaller houses that probably don't do a lot of investment banking, meaning they could be less biased. ottawacitizen.com Study forecasts stock meltdown for likes of JDS in early 2001 Jeff Pappone The Ottawa Citizen Investors riding out the latest technology stock meltdown better hold on tight because market forces have the fibre- optic industry careering toward a full-scale "train wreck," predicts telecommunications analyst Susan Kalla of New York's BlueStone Capital Partners. In a 26-page study of the fibre- optic industry, Ms. Kalla forecasts an enormous market shakeout looming for companies such as JDS Uniphase by early 2001. "You will see some hints of a slowdown in the fourth quarter of this year," she said. "But, by the first quarter next year it will be obvious, and it will be ugly." While a network-building spree doubled fibre networks across the U.S. and Europe in the past two years, this aggressive expansion by long distance operators' created a surplus of capacity that has led to deep rate cuts for services. The result will be reductions in capital spending by telecommunications carriers that will translate into earnings disappointments and slowing orders for the fibre industry, possibly leading to layoffs at manufacturing plants. "(Telecommunications carriers) don't buy unless they can achieve a greater than 50-per-cent cost benefit or they have to upgrade to compete," Ms. Kalla said. "So, without new competition, you enter a status quo period where the players don't have to do anything." The predicted slowdown period may last until 2004, she added. While he agreed that companies such as JDS face some daunting scenarios, Toronto analyst Brian Piccioni, of BMO Nesbitt Burns, isn't about to predict layoffs or wreckage on the tracks. "The way the stock market works is that if Cisco Systems stumbles, then everyone gets whacked," he said. "Expectations are so high that if Cisco doesn't continue to surprise by exactly one penny every quarter, then the stock sells off to the tune of 50 per cent in a matter of days." While small changes in a company's results often cause a disproportionate swing in stock prices, it doesn't point to a faulty business model, Mr. Piccioni said. "There are some definite signs that a slowing is going on -- there's not a clear future and maybe the share price is representing the uncertainty," Mr. Piccioni said. "But, there is a difference between the stock market reaction and the performance of the company." Ms. Kalla agreed, saying the poor market performance of companies such as JDS doesn't reflect a flawed strategy. "There's nothing that the management has done with execution that would differentiate them -- the management has done a good job and the company is running on all cylinders," she said. "But, you can't overcome the forces of nature." Mr. Piccioni predicted a slowdown in capital spending is more likely than an increase, primarily because the cost of capital -- interest rates, high-yield bond yield, access to financing from vendors or financial institutions, and the ability to issue equity -- has gone up. Jay Patel, senior analyst with the Yankee Group of Boston, Massachusetts, agrees there are external forces exerting downward pressure on growth, but he doesn't see a huge sag for the sector. If expenditures come down to a choice between upgra-ding telephone polls and installing cost-effective fibre, Mr. Patel feels most telecommunications companies would elect for the network upgrade. Mark Zohar, director of telecommunications for Cambridge, Massachusetts' Forrester Research, said he expects a temporary 12- to 18-month "plateau" until the market straightens itself out. "The threat is that if the entire telecom sector continues to be in disfavour with Wall Street and it has an impact on capital expenditures, then we might see a slowdown," said Mr. Zohar. Ms. Kalla believes revenue growth in the fibre-optics industry will level out at a more sustainable range of 30 to 35 per cent, with surviving stocks returning to an earnings growth of about 30 per cent annually. But Mr. Patel reminds that almost any company would be extremely pleased with a 35- per-cent annual growth. So, even if the outlook isn't as rosy as it once was, compared to many industries, fibre-optics offers solid returns, he said. The expected slowdown will end four years of rapid growth marked by soaring profits and exponential share prices. With 40 competitors jumping into the market after telecommunications deregulation in 1996, large carriers built their fibre-optic networks to keep pace, fuelling the exponential growth for components makers and systems integrators. "There was panic because many companies didn't want to be left out of the fibre-optic train and part of the demand over the last year was inflated," said Mr. Patel. "Now those fears are gone, and it's going to be much more balanced without the shortage worries."

To: SirRealist who wrote (41478)	11/16/2000 8:45:17 AM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 57584

SirRealist, would you please give us your opinions on what you think of the markets this morning. I can't get a handle on it. Last night the futures were up. . .Nasdaq futures were up perhaps 20 points or so by the end of AH. Then the Secretary of State called Florida "certified". . . in other words, they are saying that the election is "officially" over there as far as the state government is concerned [and pending the count of the absentee vote]. Don't you think that should have given a boost to the futures market coming into this morning. But instead the Nasdaq futures were down about 65 when I awoke at 5:45AM. Central. Nasdaq futures have rebounded a bit. . .and are currently at -57 [34 points below fair value]. Why painted so low? October CPI and core were both +0.2%. . . exactly what was expected. And the futures have not moved much since these were released. Shouldn't these markets be brightening up since the Florida announcment that pending absentee vote, they are finished? Or is there some other reason that suddenly today we should be looking downward? I can't think of any logical reason. And I appreciate any light you could shed on things. Thanks much, Rande Is