SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (5042)11/16/2000 9:30:58 AM
From: Larry S.  Respond to of 10934
 
the fact that NTAP made a new high after the march-april crash is very significant, imo. 70 looks to be very strong support. initiated first position in quite a while yesterday at 82. larry



To: Boplicity who wrote (5042)11/16/2000 9:34:03 AM
From: gingersreisse  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
Greg -

I've yet to read a post from you that is not well reasoned, supported by an interpretation of a trend or a table, and infused with a good understanding of investor psychology.

Your grace in dealing with persons holding other points of view is impressive.

One of the interesting convergences on SI is the contact among LTB&H, short sellers, cautious bulls, aggressive bulls, and folks who've made money and are scared to death of losing it <vbg>. Most investors look for support in decisions they've made, or consciously chosen to avoid making. You've found a perspective which works well for you, and I thank you for sharing it with the rest of us.

If your work scares or threatens another investor's decisions and causes her or him to rethink them, that's probably a good thing.

GSR



To: Boplicity who wrote (5042)11/16/2000 9:49:54 AM
From: pinhi  Respond to of 10934
 
Yea Greg. I totally agree with GSR. Don't change a thing with respect to your posts. You call it as you see it. Just like Willian O'neil. Don't worry about pissing off the perma-bulls or perma-bears. You got a lot of flack earlier in the year for your stance on QCOM. I saw the charts, in my gut I knew you were right, but was in denial. Could have saved a small fortune.

Pinhi



To: Boplicity who wrote (5042)11/16/2000 10:09:37 AM
From: shamsaee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10934
 
well Greg if the nasdaq went to 2000 then ntap would be at 30.Besides that I do not see how they could go down. At 30 the stock will be in a clear down trend. I feel stupid even talking about 30.In worst case scenario(market melt down) we will be back in the low 50s.