SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ben Wa who wrote (661)11/16/2000 12:59:08 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 3887
 
What really matters is the spirit of the law, our interpretation of it. Never mind that there is historical case law precedent:

Lieberman: What Counts Is 'Spirit” of the Law, Not 'Legal Detail'
By Susan Jones
CNS Morning Editor
November 16, 2000

(CNSNews.com) - Two days - that's all the Gore campaign has left to prevent Florida from declaring a final winner in the hotly disputed presidential election. On Thursday morning, Gore's public relations offense continued, with Sen. Joe Lieberman telling the nation that it's the "spirit" of the law that counts - not "the technical, legal detail of the law."

Appearing live on NBC and other networks, Lieberman expressed his "disappointment" in George W. Bush for rejecting Al Gore's "very constructive offer" of Wednesday night.

He also said Secretary of State Katherine Harris, by refusing to include additional manual recounts in the Florida's vote totals, was "doing exactly the opposite of what a chief elections official of a state should do." He suggested she was abusing her discretion because of her Republican ties.

Lieberman said he wouldn't necessarily use the word 'steal' to describe what Republicans are doing with the Florida election results. "But honestly," he said, "the Secretary of State of Florida has acted in a way that seems to me to be so unilateral, one-sided and contrary to what the spirit of the law -- let alone court decisions in Florida suggest - which is that the whole intention of an election is to have the people's desires reflected in the outcome. Not to go by the technical, legal detail of the law."

Lieberman used his appearances on the network news shows Thursday morning to blame George W. Bush for what Democrats may ultimately do - that is, go to court to force a fresh vote in Palm Beach County, where so many voters were "confused" by those butterfly ballots.

"I'm afraid that to find justice, folks in Florida, let alone our campaign, are going to have to go back to court. And again, Vice President Gore offered an opportunity to Gov. Bush to end this all in a timely and just manner, and unfortunately Gov. Bush and Secretary of State Harris rejected that opportunity."

The New York Times reports that the Gore campaign, as part of its "endgame," is preparing legal motions to force another vote in Palm Beach County, which it sees as key to a possible Gore victory. According to the newspaper, the Gore campaign considers efforts to force a new vote "the nuclear button option."

On Thursday morning, Lieberman left no doubt about who he and Al Gore consider the legitimate president-elect: He told NBC's Katie Couric, "In my hearts of hearts, first I know what everyone knows, which is that Al Gore and I won the popular election; we got more votes than Gov. Bush and Secretary Cheney.

"Second, we're ahead in the electoral college. Third, I honestly believe that if every vote cast in Florida was counted, that Al Gore and I would have won Florida, would win Florida by thousands of votes, and would therefore win the election, so I think in fairness that ought to be tested."

Lieberman also noted, "The law of Florida allows for hand recounts," and he said that several counties want to do them. "There are Republicans and Democrats right there as the votes are being counted," he added, suggesting that George W. Bush was being unreasonable for rejecting Al Gore's Wednesday-night proposal.

Several times, Lieberman said he's "afraid" that the Gore campaign's only recourse will be in the courts, and he put the blame for that squarely on Bush, for rejecting Gore's Wednesday's night proposal.

In his proposal - which was timed to interrupt the Wednesday evening newscasts on the East Coast -- Gore offered to stop all Democratic lawsuits, if Bush would agree to abide by the results of a partial or statewide manual vote recount. Gore also offered to meet with Bush twice - before and after the election results are known.

Three hours later, Bush rejected a game plan that he called "arbitrary and chaotic," but he said he'd be glad to meet with Gore after the election is settled.

"I was disappointed by Gov. Bush's response to the offer last night, both at the quick and summary rejection of the terms of the offer, but even the refusal to sit down and meet with Al Gore, as Al proposed. A one-on-one meeting could not hurt," Lieberman said on ABC's Good Morning America. "Such a meeting would be the basis for "reuniting the country after this is all over."

Lieberman hinted that Gore will not concede the election, even if the courts eventually rule that manual recounts should be included in the final tally. If those revised vote totals, plus the overseas absentee ballots, still have Gore-Lieberman coming up short - would Gore concede then? Couric asked.

Lieberman said, "A decision has not been made on that." Then, he repeated that since Bush rejected Gore's Wednesday night proposal, the option of lawsuits must remain on the table.

cnsnews.com\Politics\archive\200011\POL20001116f.html



To: Ben Wa who wrote (661)11/16/2000 1:19:36 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 3887
 
Southland Bush Backers Protest Delay in Vote Tally

Activism/Chapters Front Page News Keywords: LOS ANGELES CNN RALLY
Source: Los Angeles Times
Published: Thursday, November 16, 2000 Author: By JOE MOZINGO, Times Staff Writer
Posted on 11/16/2000 10:02:21 PST

These were not your scruffy street protesters. Their hair was trim, their shirts tucked in. They had asked for the time off work. Many had never been to a demonstration. They were Republicans, and they were brimming with anger in Hollywood on Wednesday, protesting delays in declaring the winner of the presidential election and a perceived media bias in favor of Al Gore. About 150 of them came from as far as Rancho Cucamonga and lined the corner of Sunset and Cahuenga boulevards to rally in front of the CNN building. "How many times does Al Gore have to lose?"
shouted James Joblon, of Redondo Beach. "If we get involved in hand-counting every ballot in the country, this thing will never stop." Earlier in the day, the burly stockbroker at Morgan, Stanley, Dean Whitter had put his calls on hold, had a colleague stand in for him, and drove 45 minutes to join the first rally of his life. His starched white shirt and gray trousers belied an aggressive temperament. "I have ABC, CBS and NBC on my speed dial. When I see liberal bias, I call and complain. But they know my voice now, so I have to disguise it." The rally was organized by a state GOP volunteer and Beverly Hills dentist, Joel Strom, who contacted numerous grass-roots groups. The call touched a nerve in people like the 34-year-old Joblon, who said they were frustrated that CNN and the other networks called the election in Florida for Gore long before the polls were closed, possibly discouraging Republicans from voting. Joblon was working at the Manhattan Beach Republican Party headquarters at the time, calling party members and urging them to vote. The early call for Gore "deflated us," he said. "We couldn't get people to vote." But mainly the demonstrators Wednesday feared there would be no end to the legal battle if Vice President Al Gore doesn't concede the election and give up his efforts to recount the ballots. "First they're trying to redefine the word 'is'!" announced one woman, referring to President Clinton's grand jury testimony during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. "Now they're trying to redefine the word 'vote.' " She complained that Gore was only pushing for a recount of Democratic counties, thus further skewing the results. Around her, others chanted: "CNN, Stop the Spin" and "No Bush, No Justice!" as cars and trucks on Sunset honked in support of the demonstrators. Dorie Hollowell, a first-time protester and home-schooling mother from Glendale, got an e-mail message about the rally from a local GOP group. She felt compelled to come down because she worries that if the election gets mired in the courts, it will turn into something akin to the O.J. Simpson trial. "He gets a team of big lawyers and he wins," she said, referring to Simpson and Gore. Connie Miller, a 54-year-old grandmother of nine, loaded her Chevy minivan with six strangers from her local Republican chapter in conservative Rancho Cucamonga and headed to Hollywood. The morass of an election was infuriating enough to prompt this baby-boomer, who once voted for Jimmy Carter and Jerry Brown, to make a placard and join her first protest. "We can put this whole thing through the court systems," she said. "But there is a time when humble men put their own ambitions aside."