SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (87591)11/16/2000 3:12:41 PM
From: waverider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
87!!!!!!!!



To: JMD who wrote (87591)11/16/2000 3:14:35 PM
From: ggamer  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 152472
 
People thanks a million for all your inputs. I feel the same way about the SF area RE market but I feel like I am missing out compared to friends and family who see their home prices go up $10K a month.

I am very confident about holding my QCOM shares but wouldn't you say that owning a property in the past has been a safer bet than owning shares in companies like QCOM. Please don't attack me, because I love this stock. May be I don't know what I am talking about. : )

GGamer



To: JMD who wrote (87591)11/16/2000 3:25:12 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
>> if you want to buy in the City or Silicon Valley you will be robbed, raped, and pillaged; if you want to buy anywhere else, you'll simply get screwed.

<<<ROFLMAO!!!>>>

As a Silicon Valley denizen, I can relate to that.

I live in a house that cost $34,000 when it was built in 1970, and current comparables are at 3/4 of a mil. It's certainly not a value play.

uf


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News