Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OX who wrote (35783)	11/16/2000 4:50:29 PM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 42787

J.Baker said he thought the markets were all focused on the counts; and the Dems (I think Daley) said, the markets don't care, aren't watching and go up and down regardless. IMO, they are both wrong; but Daley's a little closer. NAZ has been headed down a lot longer than the election. Initially, the markets were reacting, but most of this week, the market will give a twitch when judge or Secretary says something and 15 minutes later it's back where it was. On the other hand when Merrill says semis suck....or the Fed is worried about inflation [Does anyone remember the last time AG wasn't worried about inflation?] that moves the market. But I do think the market will rally, regardless of who wins, when it's over. In the end, I'd bet two twinkies that Bush wins. Regards, jttmab

To: OX who wrote (35783)	11/16/2000 5:45:30 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Respond to of 42787

Gore could care less. I am sure he's telling himself "once I'm in, it'll snap right back" duh!