Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (6375)	11/17/2000 12:57:42 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

since there was no ambiguity about Clinton's election. Well, I'm glad you feel that way... Considering that Clinton won because Perot captured such a large portion of the popular vote that neither Bush or Clinton represented anywhere near a majority of the electorate. I'm sure you'll now be more than willing to concede that being elected based upon the MINORITY of the popular vote due to an irrelevant alternation (Nader) does not necessarily equate to a weak presidency. Clinton is a master politician and a master manipulator of people's emotions. Let's face it, Jack Stanton from "Primary Colors" is the spitting image of Bill Clinton when it comes to BSing his way into office... We all know people who are BSers... But few of us would trust them with our money, or our daughters.