Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Computerized Thermal Imaging CIO (formerly COII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chirodoc who wrote (5754)	11/18/2000 1:07:24 PM
From: Profiteer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6039

This woman sure looks more comfortable having a CTI system scan than should we say.. having her "breasts" in a wringer! deseretnews.com

To: chirodoc who wrote (5754)	11/26/2000 6:34:07 PM
From: chirodoc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6039

***MAMMOGRAPHY vs. CTI vs. BIOPSY****** PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CTI SCANNER AND BIOPSY ARE APPROXIMATELY 20% MORE SENSITIVE (ACCURATE) THAN MAMMOGRAM, BASED ON THE STUDIES I JUST POSTED! A review17 of the current clinical trial data, published and unpublished, summarized screening test performance for mammography using uniform definitions. Sensitivity of mammography did not dramatically differ across the trials. Estimates from three Swedish trials using mammography alone averaged about 75%. REMEMBER THAT BIOPSY IS NOT 100% ACCURATE. SOME ESTIMATES ARE THAT IT IS 95-98% ACCURATE(SENSITIVE), CLOSE TO THE CTI SCANNER.