SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (118200)11/17/2000 1:34:44 PM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Amy, Re: Basically, the Judge is saying "yes, both statutes are true."

Which is what all those court ruling so far is about. They just reemphasize what is so obvious to everyone. The only hope Democrate has is to prove that Harris has some personal interest involved if they want to overturn her ruling(legally she is the person to certify the result and has the authority to take whatever number she feels fit). It is unfortunate for Gore camp that they are fighting in a state kind of control by GOP.



To: Amy J who wrote (118200)11/17/2000 2:25:41 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Amy,

while another statute of the law works against this law and allows the SOS to disregard the results of the manual counts

Harris is going to ignore only the results from counties that missed the deadline and missed the deadline without a good reason. She included the manual counts from counties that submitted on time - Volusia county and I believe from small counties that don't have machines.

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News