Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: isopatch who wrote (79342)	11/17/2000 2:09:05 PM
From: kodiak_bull	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 95453

OT: I'm a long way removed the from minutiae of federal civil procedure and the current state of states rights, and I'm sure the Bush lawyers have their "best" arguments for why a Federal Court should intervene, but it wouldn't wash with me. Otoh, I'm a dispassionate observer. As a Federal Court I would look at it and say the laws are quite clear, even Federal elections are to be administered by the states. This falls squarely within state administrative law and decisions, no relief granted to Bush, exit stage right. Solamente dos centavos.