Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (118207)	11/17/2000 3:19:46 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jozef, Re: As far as actions of Kathleen Harris, I find her actions logical with the only contradiction which was her call for halt of manual recount until a consistent standards are in place, while she accepted manual recount from Volusia county that came in before she called for standards. Exactly and having the court force something down her throat would be horrible to the complete system, state wide or nation wide. If it works, you can do the same to the decision of your president which means the court will be running the country not the current division of power, which is court, house and president.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (118207)	11/17/2000 3:48:30 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, If she accepts manual recounts, I think she is making an error (or a partisan decision) in certification, considering the weight of the issue. Pure speculation, but another thing that would be interesting. The counties don't legally have to get their absentee votes in for a week. If a Democratic county, in a partisan decision, decided to delay the submission, she couldn't certify the election, the manual counts could be completed, and then there would be another decision. I don't expect that to happen, just a random thought. John