Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Habib who wrote (86958)	11/17/2000 4:47:16 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

I don't know where you got the PB figures, but if they are true, then what you say is indeed correct. One thing, however, is that chad problem in PB is more an issue of people punching more than one perforation. IF they managed to punch through more than one, then they are going to be tossed out. End of story. Doesn't matter who they were going to vote for or what the machine said. The statistical anomaly in PB may be high, but it isn't because of a machine problem, but a voter problem. I don't think Gore is going to get what he thinks is there, however.