Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Options Box -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (7416)	11/17/2000 5:21:39 PM
From: Poet	Respond to of 10876

Thanks, TLC. It's getting so convoluted that I can't keep it straight. BTW, I saw that thread. Should've know you started it. <ggg>

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (7416)	11/17/2000 5:39:24 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10876

The Florida Supreme Court has enjoined (ordered) the Florida Sec. of State to not certify the votes from Florida by tomorrow. That was the legal deadline that is state law. Now... please explain to me (as if I was a 2 year old)... How can a SC ORDER the Sec. of State NOT to comply with the law. ----> particularly when this law, is a clear law. There were NO "controversial" points to such law (I assume), prior to this event. My point is... Whatever position you take, the other side could argue anything, (including the definition of the words, as in "is"). This could have no end... It is possible that these "strategies" are taken all the time... but isn't there a time for reason ? At what point does one stop with the bs?