SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (128788)11/17/2000 6:50:12 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1570242
 
RE:"Actually it was damaged ballots in New Mexico that put Bush in the lead. Later, uncounted ballots put Gore back in the lead."

I thought it was those 68k from Bernaillo county that pushed Bush in the lead?//

Jim



To: Scumbria who wrote (128788)11/19/2000 7:14:35 PM
From: jbkelle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570242
 
Scumbria, You are incorrect. It was a corrected vote count from Dona Ana county that put Gore in the lead...a tally of 620 for Gore was tallied initially as 120 (easily understood when you look at the tally sheet). This was corrected after Bush's count was finalized, putting Gore in the lead for good. jbk


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News