Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: t2 who wrote (17513)	11/17/2000 7:14:09 PM
From: William Brotherson	Respond to of 65232

Yes, The machines in Palm Beach worked properly. They were checked and rechecked. What didn't jive were the numbers from count one to count two, thus the recount for a third time. The recount is nothing in my opinion, every court was correct that they have the right to keep counting until the 2004 election if they so choose, but the Secretary of State also has just as much right to say that she won't accept there new numbers, which is just as legal as them still counting. So the count is nothing, they have the right to continue, she has already made her decision not to take any numbers after the state law imposed deadline, done deal, now the only thing that does matter is the Supreme Court, will they find wrong doing??? I think NOT!!! wb