Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lonnie who wrote (80255)	11/17/2000 7:24:56 PM
From: monu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

And partial birth abortion? Watch out for the game of words. IF I can call a child a fetus, well then I can somehow not see him or her as quite human. Get it? Why do you think this nation is killing babies that are ready to come out of the womb? Simple:just dehumanize them, which is what you're doing. One doesn't have to be a fanatic to be a realist. Your argument goes back to the slavery thing. If I can consider someone of another race to not be quite human, well then I can do what I want with them. Hopefully, you'll see the truth someday.

To: Lonnie who wrote (80255)	11/17/2000 7:25:59 PM
From: briskit	Respond to of 769667

Many arguments attempt to defend abortion as benefitting the as yet unborn. That argument is what I question. Perhaps you are saying that we should not consider what that fetus might have wanted. (Caveat: That is opposite to the arguments in the current election argument). That, again, is simply the argument that wonen get what they want regardless of any other consideration, i.e. the possible interests of the fetus.

To: Lonnie who wrote (80255)	11/17/2000 8:02:17 PM
From: BishopsChild	Respond to of 769667

Big difference too between a GORE and a BUSH..........

To: Lonnie who wrote (80255)	11/17/2000 8:11:04 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

<< Big difference between a human and a fetus. >> If politicians ever get control over women's reproductive system, where will that slippery slope go next. Will they then want to protect unfertilized eggs, which, after all, could be argued to represent human life, since it can be fertilized outside of a woman's body. Anyone think I'm joking? Then you haven't dealt with a lot of conservative prolife radical wackoes. America must NEVER open the door to reproductive repression.