Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (61419)	11/17/2000 7:25:06 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Michael, I agree that hand recount of the whole state is necessary. Bush looks really chickensh*t at this point for avoiding that. He wants to hold on to his precious little 300 vote lead, at any expense to the election's credibility. Scumbria

To: mishedlo who wrote (61419)	11/17/2000 8:52:26 PM
From: J Krnjeu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Hello mishedlo, I mean no disrespect. I say recount the entire state if that is what it takes. That was a very very reasonable offer by Gore. A third time! Why, just because Gore didn't get a count he liked. The law was followed with the second recount and Gore lost that one too. That offer by Gore was a losers' offer cause he had nothing to lose, he hadn't won. No more recounts, just count the absentee ballots and be done with it. Announce the president and be done with it, Bush or Gore. Federal Court can not do anything until Bush loses. Democrats counting only Democratic wards are deigning Bush equal protection under the law. That's federal law, state has nothing to do with it. Anyway, just count the absentee and be done with it!!! Thank You JK