Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: richard surckla who wrote (61437)	11/18/2000 1:39:18 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

Here we go again! Hundreds of overseas ballots rejected... dailynews.yahoo.com

To: richard surckla who wrote (61437)	11/18/2000 2:17:10 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

<<At first a recount was called for and it was done by machine without malfunction>> If it was done without malfunction why did the vote totals differ? I strongly disagree. The manual recount is necessary and various state laws support manual recounts with higher accuracy one of the reasons. Since machines can not count tickets with dangling chads, and since machines cannot count write-in votes, they are inherantly incorrect and flawed. It is possible that some people who could not find the correct hole, wrote in the Gore's name. Finally, she let the votes trickle in from overseas, while cutting off the recounts. This too is inconsistant as well as biased. This woman clearly needs to be punished.