Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (1001)	11/18/2000 1:18:46 PM
From: SE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

Hard to discuss these things with those who have a closed mind. Spot on. Bye. -Scott

To: Ellen who wrote (1001)	11/18/2000 1:24:11 PM
From: MasonS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3887

Comments? thenewrepublic.com

To: Ellen who wrote (1001)	11/18/2000 2:19:22 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3887

Ellen, You don't understand the facts, do you. You state << And you have no opinion on the Republicans adding previously rejected ballots to their total in Seminole County? And you have no opinion on the fact they don't want rejected ballots allowed in other counties? And you have no opinion that they have done what they are now trying to prevent elsewhere? Not to worry, I don't expect an objective response. >> In Seminole County they re-examined a small number of ballots that were rejected by the machine. I have absolutely no problem with Palm Beach or any other county doing this exact same thing. I do have a problem with a democratic dominated board re-counting ALL of the 1 million ballots in 3 democratic counties. This is not an apples to apples comparison. What was done in Seminole county was perfectly acceptable and I'd be pleased if they did the same thing in Palm Beach. This activity has absolutely nothing to do with the vote stealing going on in these other counties. Dave