Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (61451)	11/18/2000 4:18:40 PM
From: richard surckla	Respond to of 93625

mishwdlo... "Gore offered to recount the entire state, Bush turned him down. Now you are complaining about equal protection." mishedlo, are you not reading the posts regarding this mater? Are you so blinded by the Democratic BS, or do you just enjoy wearing the BLINDERS? Gore CANNOT (CANNOT) make such an offer. He has no authority to make such an offer. The state laws do not permit such a statewide recount to be offered by anybody, including the FL supreme court. This law was passed by the FL legislature and would have to be changed by them through due process. I know you are an intelligent person. I guess this is why you have me confused by your thinking in this matter.

To: mishedlo who wrote (61451)	11/19/2000 6:17:54 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Mishedlo, They are not recounting wards, they are recounting counties, at least I would hope. I understand the Democrats rationale for asking for a hand recount in Palm Beach county (the Butterfly Ballot issue). What was the Democratic rationale for picking other selected counties (which lean heavily towards the Democratic side) to recount? Why didn't they propose recounting the entire state right from the start? The question just occurred to me when reading your message. Thanks, Dave