Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (2607)	11/18/2000 8:30:34 PM
From: Vendit™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

I thought that Florida law was the book of law in question at this point.(?)

To: Windsock who wrote (2607)	11/18/2000 8:33:35 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

You know you are spinning your wheels trying to nail old Vendit don't you? He will come back with some re-statement of how your reference to the TX law is irrelevant in the FL situation or that the error rate of the machines in FL is different from TX machines. A manual recount is slower and that is its only deficiency relative to the machine. If it weren't more accurate, then why has it been consistently used in THOUSANDS OF CLOSE ELECTIONS ACROSS THE NATION FOR YEARS, to the benefit of Republicans as well as Democrats? TG