Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl R. who wrote (97)	11/19/2000 10:36:51 AM
From: Magnatizer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 644

Carl, Bosco I have been following your discussion and thought this would be of interest to both of you... Message 14842173 ht Mag

To: Carl R. who wrote (97)	11/19/2000 1:36:11 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 644

<ot>Hi Carl - oops, I did understand your point with regard to the postmark thing. I dunno. What if the ballot was received on the day of the election? Surely, regardless of postmark or country of origin, the vote was cast on time. If there is nothing wrong with the ballot itself, I think many people may take exception to such technicality. After all, should the voter be penalized by a foreign post office who has inadvertently failed to cancel the mail? With regard to the ballot request, you are right. Except that it is not county employees, but cnn.com The question remains, if you are going to stick to the strict observant [vs interpretation] of law, are you going to allow this? Personally, I ve no idea [if this is legal or not.] best, Bosco