Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vendit™ who wrote (2639)	11/19/2000 9:26:05 AM
From: Carolyn	Respond to of 6710

It is important for everyone to see this information because many are confused. I cannot see how the Florida Supreme Court can ignore the blatant tampering with the individual ballots.

To: Vendit™ who wrote (2639)	11/19/2000 9:36:02 AM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

There you go again: <<"1- The election itself (Bush won)">> The OFFICIAL results of this are not complete. Three states have still not been certified. In the other 47 states plus DC, Gore maintains a 255 - 246 electoral vote lead and 200,000 +/- popular vote lead nationwide. How can you possibly call that a clear "Bush win" <<"2- Gore asked for recount (Bush won)">> As you continue to incorrectly insist, your #2 above was an AUTOMATIC recount in FL dictated by FL law and not requested by either candidate. Bush's lead was reduced significantly (from nearly 2000 to 300) as a result of this AUTOMATIC recount. [You're never going to accept this are you Vendit?] <<"3- Gore asked for a second recount (Bush won)">> This "second recount", which is Gore's FIRST request for a recount, is the manual count, guaranteed by FL law as a result of a 300 vote differential out of 6 million votes cast. This count has never been completed, you know it hasn't been completed, and you can't prove otherwise. <<"4- Gore asks for hand recount (Bush will win)">> This is redundancy on your part. Vendit. Your number 4 point is number 3, the "hand recount" that is still on-going. As I have stated before, this manual hand count has stopped, started,stopped and restarted as a result of on-going litigation. For some reason, every time it RESTARTS, you choose to call it a NEW count. I must admit, you are a worthy adversary vendit. Your spin control is good, but let's try and get the facts straight every now and then. TG

To: Vendit™ who wrote (2639)	11/19/2000 12:30:54 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

Joe Lieberman, whose reputation has apparently been destroyed by this election, casually dismissed Schwartzkopf on "Meet the Press" as pro-Bush.