SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (35270)11/19/2000 1:14:35 PM
From: Nemer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 50167
 
Good Morning Cousin Ike ....I read the DallasNews this morning before going to Mass and found this "old info" ... but knowing that most of the folks on this thread aren't Texans I figured it would be of interest ...
I recall this happening and the furor it created at the time ..

In retrospect, it seems all the more chilling to me .......

This is no joke, it true ... unfortunately ...
The reason I didn't hotline the URL is I don't know how long the DMN keeps articles like this in the archives , so I cut and paste it here ....

==========================================================
1948 primary snared LBJ, ex-governor in vote-fraud tangle

11/19/2000

By Scott Parks / The Dallas Morning News

A race so close you couldn't slip a thread between the candidates. Political and legal wrangling that threatens to drag on for weeks. Suspicions that votes might get added or subtracted after Election Day.

A synopsis of the epic battle between Al Gore and George W. Bush?

Maybe.

But many Texas historians and political experts have been watching the blur of events in Florida and remembering four agonizing weeks that followed the most controversial election in state history.

The 1948 Democratic primary contest for U.S. Senate between Lyndon B. Johnson and Coke Stevenson contained all of the elements of the Bush-Gore race – and much more.

Callan Graham, now 86, was a young lawyer when he volunteered to help Mr. Stevenson prove that Mr. Johnson and his South Texas supporters had stolen the election with 200 fraudulent votes in one precinct – the now-infamous Box 13 in Jim Wells County.

Mr. Johnson won the race by 87 votes out of almost 1 million cast in the Aug. 28, 1948, Democratic primary runoff. Mr. Stevenson, who had been governor and lieutenant governor through the 1940s, faded into obscurity. Mr. Johnson , tarnished by the Box 13 scandal and saddled with the nickname "Landslide Lyndon," became president when John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963.

"If we had won it for [former] Governor Stevenson, there's no doubt it would have changed the course of our nation's history," said Mr. Graham, a retired state representative and legislative lobbyist.

The 1948 election contained high drama – a tense confrontation between armed men, allegations of fraud, missing election records, state and federal court fights and unyielding candidates. Ultimately, a U.S. Supreme Court justice resolved the contest.

Ronnie Dugger, a Texas journalist and Johnson biographer, said the major difference between the long counts in 1948 and 2000 is that no one has alleged Box 13-type fraud in Florida.

But the political game, Mr. Dugger said, appears to be essentially the same as the one that played out in 1948: "How many votes do you need to win and how long can you hold out your returns to find out the answer to that question."

In 1948, Texas voted on a Saturday. When everyone went to bed that night, Mr. Stevenson held an 854-vote lead. But all the counties had not reported their totals. Others submitted corrections well into the following week.

By Thursday, Mr. Stevenson's margin had shrunk to 351 votes. And by Friday, it disappeared entirely when counties controlled by South Texas political boss George B. Parr began reporting new votes for Mr. Johnson.

Box 13 in Alice provided the clincher when Parr loyalists reported an additional 200 votes for Mr. Johnson. The "corrected" total from Box 13 put Mr. Johnson ahead by 87 votes.

Not ready to concede

The Republican Party of Texas was virtually nonexistent outside Houston and Dallas. This meant that Mr. Johnson, a 40-year-old congressman, would sail past his GOP opponent in November and arrive in the U.S. Senate in January.1

But Mr. Stevenson was not ready to concede.

A slate of "reform" Democrats had taken over the Jim Wells County executive committee. They were ready to defy Mr. Parr and throw out the questionable Box 13 results.

Mr. Stevenson dispatched Mr. Graham and two other young lawyers to Jim Wells County to investigate Box 13. Those who understood the desolate brush country south of San Antonio advised them not to wear a suit coat so armed pistoleros could see that they were not carrying guns.

"It was scary going into town that day," Mr. Graham said. "It's pretty funny now, but all I had was a law book."

The Parr men who controlled the county would not show them the precinct tally or the signature list of those who voted. The records were locked in a bank vault, they said.

In frustration, Mr. Stevenson enlisted the aid of legendary Texas Ranger Frank Hamer, the man who engineered the fatal ambush of Bonnie and Clyde in 1934. Together, they drove to Alice to look at the Box 13 records.

Robert Caro, another Johnson biographer, recounted the scene as Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Hamer, both in their 60s, walked through downtown toward the bank. Armed men surrounded them, and one group literally blocked the bank's entrance.

"Git!" Mr. Hamer ordered. "Fall back!" And the group parted. The young lawyers who followed Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Hamer down the street didn't remember what words were said, Mr. Caro wrote.

"They only remember how, walking behind the old Texas Ranger, they suddenly realized how big he was and how he carried himself and how his right hand was poised just above the butt of his gun, his fingers curled for the draw."

Once inside the bank, Mr. Stevenson and his team got a look at the Box 13 voter list but were not allowed to copy it. Later, they testified that the last 200 names on the list were written in the same ink, in the same handwriting and in alphabetical order.

Mr. Stevenson's lawyers memorized enough names to later take affidavits from Box 13 "voters" who said they never voted. The names of at least three dead people appeared on the voter list.
*(italics mine)*

Court action

Newspaper reports reveal that Mr. Johnson was the first to initiate court action. Two weeks after the election, his lawyers obtained a state district judge's order restraining the Jim Wells County "reform" Democrats from meeting and throwing out the 200 tainted Johnson votes in Box 13.

The Johnson legal team fought to keep the restraining order in effect until the State Democratic Executive Committee could meet in Fort Worth and certify Mr. Johnson as the party's nominee for U.S. Senate.

At the moment the committee vote was taken, Mr. Stevenson's attorneys were holding forth in an Alice courtroom, trying to dissolve the restraining order. The Parr-controlled state district judge ruled against them.

The committee voted, 29-28, to certify the vote (including the 200 disputed ballots) and to name Mr. Johnson as the nominee.

Pleas from Stevenson attorney Clint Small fell on deaf ears. "The issue is whether or not Precinct 13 in Jim Wells County is to elect a United States senator," he said.

Federal review

Mr. Stevenson claimed the State Democratic Executive Committee's failure to investigate Box 13 violated his civil rights. So, he and his team went to work in the federal courts. They found U.S. District Judge T. Whitfield Davidson of Dallas and persuaded him to issue a temporary injunction against placement of Mr. Johnson's name on the November ballot.

Judge Davidson suggested that the names of both men be placed on the ballot to let the voters decide.

"Without [this compromise], you will have the feeling among some in Texas that the winner has won on a technicality," he said.

Mr. Johnson turned down Judge Davidson's idea. Instead, he decided to fight. It was a risky strategy because testimony from voters in Jim Wells County might reveal the irregularities in Box 13.

Judge Davidson appointed masters, or assistant judges, to determine the facts about Box 13. He set a hearing for Tuesday, Sept. 28, a month after Election Day.

Mr. Johnson's lawyers argued that a state election, conducted by a political party, was not subject to federal court review. They took their plea to an appeals court and then to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The dramatic climax was close at hand.

The federal court master, holding court in Alice, was about to order the opening of all Jim Wells County ballot boxes. Mr. Stevenson's attorneys believed the fraudulent votes were about to be exposed.

At the same moment in Washington, D.C., U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black accepted Mr. Johnson's argument that Judge Davidson had no jurisdiction in a state election. He signed an order dissolving the temporary injunction against placing Mr. Johnson's name on the ballot.

Immediately, Johnson partisans contacted court officials in Alice. The hearing ended without the opening of Box 13. Over the years, researchers have tried to find Box 13 and its records, but they remain missing.

Ted Gittinger, an oral historian at the LBJ Library in Austin, said he has read dozens of interviews given by those involved in the 1948 election. And he has read the daily newspaper accounts that kept Texans riveted to their radios for more than a month.

The closeness of the election – 87 votes, or about one-hundredth of 1 percent difference – led the combatants to fight it out to the bitter end, he said.

As he watched the Bush-Gore bout in Florida, Mr. Gittinger said he wondered, "Will either man ever have the courage and the wisdom to say, "Enough is enough?'"



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (35270)11/19/2000 1:58:08 PM
From: Jeff Jordan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 50167
 
I had an early comment when this thing started...

" How low will Gore go to be elected?"

Well now it's obvious...whatever it takes.

Here's the disgusting tragedy:

Members of the arm services votes are being discarded on technicalities: If there are ballots of more importance to be counted it is those whom have provided us our freedoms today. This country has high standards which has been preserved by the shedding of blood for our liberties and for the liberties of many other peace loving people in the world. The tragedy is this candidate, a vice president of the United States seeking to become the commander in chief of the free world is disenfranchising those that are called upon to pay the highest price an individual can give for their country and protect our liberities are being ignored because of the blind ambition of one very small man....sickening.....what country will respect this man if elected? How can the US remain a leader in the world and be respected? The damage is immeasurable.

As a citizen, I demand all illegally counted ballots of felons in Florida be uncounted!

fairness? Only under vote ballots are being hand counted for misreads? Why aren't machine read ballots for Gore not inspected for double votes using the pregnant chads or dimples? Isn't this a double standard? This is no way a fair hand recount...all ballots should be read under the same standards..

I prey the Florida supreme court does the right thing...



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (35270)11/19/2000 8:20:55 PM
From: Chip McVickar  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 50167
 
Ike,

Thought you might find this interesting...?

A forwarded message came through earlier from a very good friend of mine...!

NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE ELECTION

A history professor from Uppsala Universitet in Sweden, called to tell me about an article she had read in which a Zimbabwe politician was quoted as saying that children should study this event closely for it shows that election fraud is not only a third world phenomenon:

1. Imagine that we read of an election occuring anywhere in the developing world (for that matter in parts of Europe) in which the self-declared winner was the son of the former prime minister and that former prime minister was himself the former head of that nation's secret police (cia).

2. Imagine that the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some old colonial holdover (electoral college) from the nation's pre-democracy past.

3. Imagine that the self-declared winner's 'victory' turned on disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother!

4. Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots of one district, a district heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of voters to vote for the wrong candidate.

5. Imagine that the members of that nation's most despised caste, fearing for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to vote in near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner's candidacy.

6. Imagine that hundreds of the members of that most-despised caste were intercepted on their way to the polls by state police operating under the authority of the self-declared winner's brother.

7. Imagine that six million people voted in the disputed province and that the self-declared winner's 'lead' was only 327 votes. Fewer, certainly, than the vote counting machines' margin of error.

8. Imagine that the self-declared winner and his political party opposed a more careful by-hand inspection and re-counting of the ballots in the disputed province or in its most hotly disputed district.

9. Imagine that the self-declared winner, himself a governor of a major province, had the worst human rights record of any province in his nation and actually led the nation in executions.

10. Imagine that a major campaign promise of the self-declared winner was to appoint like-minded human rights violators to lifetime positions on the high court of that nation.

None of us would deem such an election to be representative of anything other than the self-declared winner's will-to-power. All of us, I imagine, would wearily turn the page thinking that it was another sad tale of pitiful pre- or anti-democracy peoples in some strange elsewhere.