Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (39052)	11/19/2000 12:57:34 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I wasn't making the claim that vote fraud occurred. Perhaps not, but CB was and implying the renegade Votomatics were some sort of example, proof or evidence of that fact. Simply not so. If this is the best people making this claim can offer they got a problem...Trust me...I've preped lawyers for a voter fraud cases as a consultant...I could tell you stories. And this is chickensh!t. I'm "on call" myself over this holiday week in the event this thing gets busted wide open and moves to other locales. I would get out of bed for an argument this poorly conceived (as renegade Votomatics) let alone miss Thanksgiving with my family. I've made this clear and hopefully I won't get a call. The burden of proof is on those that are conducting the recount to ensure that the machines and ballots are secured and kept free from tampering, and that the process of recounting is impartial. In this case unsecured "machines" don't mean a thing...And that's what we were discussing...Jeez...