Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Charles Swope who wrote (43617)	11/19/2000 1:53:26 PM
From: PMS Witch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77397

Here's my plans... Take all the ballots and form one big pile. Split the pile into two. Let Gore people count one pile and Bush people count the other. Then switch the piles and re-count them. For every error one group makes and is discovered by the other, deduct that vote and one 'penalty' vote in addition. This'll keep the counters honest. Repeat the process until counts become consistent. Another plan would be to have Gore counters count Gore votes, while Bush counters count Bush votes. Those ballots clearly and unambiguously cast will be directed to the proper hands without question, leaving only the ballots marked in an unclear manner to be contested. Because these ballots would be few in number, interpreting the voter intent would become a manageable process for the courts. Lastly, Gore could concede victory. This would be much faster and the end result would be the same: Bush in the White House. Cheers, PW.