Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Triffin who wrote (1233)	11/19/2000 1:01:06 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 3887

any precinct tries to submit a "total" for certification that exceeds the number of voters known to have cast their votes .. then the SOS would be acting within her discretion to deny those votes in the certification process .. Mr. Serling, you have now entered The Twilight Zone. No one has ever suggested this, nor has it happened, nor could it be a reason for denying the cert AS OF NOV 7, 2000. We now return control of your TV set to its original upright position. :))

To: Triffin who wrote (1233)	11/19/2000 7:19:16 PM
From: Zeuspaul	Respond to of 3887

Therefore; for each precinct the total exact number of "verifiable" votes is known .. ie .. you can't come up with more valid votes in a given precinct than the total number of registered voters that signed in on Nov 7th I think the signatures should be verified. There have been reports/rumors of poll workers voting in lieu of the voter. A signature check should shake this out if it exists. One could check one hundred or so precincts with statistically high voter turnout. Zeuspaul