SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oblomov who wrote (39062)11/19/2000 2:02:07 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Excellent points, Oblomov.



To: Oblomov who wrote (39062)11/19/2000 2:29:46 PM
From: wsringeorgia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Oblomov, I really like your post! I have never been to Brazil but have been to other places where constantly guarded and patrolled gated communities are the norm for the wealthy (heck, even for the struggling middle class, clerks, schoolteachers, ect.) and for the very wealthy, as necessary as a bank account is armed bodyguards, even "private armies". One thing though that took me quite a while to figure out is that in some of those places its a little more complicated than meets the eye and it may be this way in Brazil: In these places the wealthy pay little or no taxes; if the government, even a populist government puts pressure on the rich there is then massive capital flight. So a sort of bargain is struck, the government provides literally nothing in the way of security or "policing services" for the rich and in turn the rich pay almost no taxes. Would that work here? It would be interesting, for sure. WSR



To: Oblomov who wrote (39062)11/19/2000 4:06:01 PM
From: NOW  Respond to of 436258
 
It is sad indeed that it is IMPOSSIBLE to imagine the republican party as actually being libertarian: the current stance is that govt intervention is fine, as long as it favours MY constituency...