Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (118404)	11/19/2000 5:33:02 PM
From: exhon2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John: re >>Seriously, that's about the funniest thing I have ever heard<< What Joe says seems reasonable to me. The convicted felons in Florida who voted might be dragging the scores down for the dems. John, you need to get in touch with the constituency.

To: Road Walker who wrote (118404)	11/19/2000 6:45:21 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John, Your assumption that you keep repeating is that Democrats and Republicans are the same and all your arguments start from this premise, and only conclusions based on this premise are "objective". It seems that holding any opinion means losing objectivity. How about your axiom that Reps and Dems are the same? It's an opinion. Don't you lose objectivity holding this opinion? Or, are you just like everyone else, and believe that only your views are objective? I've met racist folks before, but political prejudice is new to me <ggg>. I told you about a study about which I read in a newspaper. How is it different from polls that find that men favor Republicans, women Democrats? Is everyone believing this also guilty of prejudice? Is every rule that has exceptions worthless? Is it prejudicial to say that Sahara is a desert, since it has (very infrequent) rainy days? Joe