Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: baggo who wrote (116970)	11/19/2000 8:26:20 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 120523

Valuations are still sky high. No one called SDLI the blimp down exactly to 60, we are really into other blimps but we enjoyed that one as a 'side order'.. a smorgasbord together with the others. You exaggerate the power of a public bulletin board where posters are novices like you and don't know what weight to put on posts. At least we give the facts here and don't put down lists to buy but react on fundamentals we feel are exaggerated and analysts upgrades and price targets that are downright criminal We saw a slowdown brewing and if you didn't see it, that's too bad. We don't think its over yet. When growth is slowing and profits are slowing and cash flow is slowing you can't have triple digit multiples, and this truism will more than likely continue through 2001. We called the downfall of the oil service, tech sector and even the internet sector on this thread and if you think we caused the downfall by calling the high prices and absurd valuations than so be it. Common sense is what we are guilty of and called JDSU short at 114 and not living like ostriches with our heads in the sand like many investors. Denial is a problem that might stem from something not covered in a financial bulletin board. There are other help groups and support groups for those kind of problems. You might want to move onto another media. We did well with our short plays and will continue going long and finding safer havens stocks in financial and pharmaceuticals and very carefully select tech.. where bad news is the norm and stocks move up only on a day bad news is contained for a while.

To: baggo who wrote (116970)	11/19/2000 9:41:52 PM
From: Jenna	Respond to of 120523

Brice, you have a service, a chat room, a competitive site whether for pay or not is not the issue. There is ALWAYS an agenda when someone flies off the handle. We had it with the count, who charges a mint for his 'offerings'. You are just another disgruntled financial site that has gone awry and we have only had about 3 or 4 like you in the past 116,000 posts. We are used to it by now. You can transplant anyone you like into our room, from your own room (you actually could use some good picks) but if you did in fact go long AGIL at the time when we went short or go long NUAN or NTIQ when we went short as you profess, or ARBA, MUSE etc, than let G-d be with you friend. We have two (2) services a subscription watch list and earnings play service as well as a real-time trading forum so we work on them both. Traders are not stupid and they still have the free will to make their own decisions as to their preference. Fortunately there are choices and sore losers. It is expected but people are aware that those with the most animosity are those that are in the game themselves and where but for the grace of G-d... would be successful if they coulda, woulda... but can'ta so they get 'bitta..