Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bosquedog who wrote (1289)	11/19/2000 9:15:45 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3887

> The entire machine versus human count issue in Texas deals with in a recount, if the 2 sides can not agree to which method to use....it defaults to human count. < And Bush signed the bill which provides that a manual recount is preferable. So why is he so (conveniently) adamantly against it now - to the point of saying it is unconstitutional? His change in position on that doesn't wash with me. I certainly have appreciated the even-keeled exchange with you. It just absolutely makes no sense to me that Republicans - most especially their spin doctors on tv - continually complain about or ridicule the manual recount and no one questions them about that position. A double standard is a double standard.