Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (118447)	11/19/2000 10:27:58 PM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 186894

Hi Duke, why is that you claim she did not violate the FL Statute, when the Judge in fact said her ruling did, and he essentially told her she could not continue to do so? Did you not read the Judge's actual text where he said he disagreed with her ruling? It violated FL Statutes. Possibly you are confused by what Steve Harris brought up, which was essentially Steve's attempt at trying to prove Harris didn't violate FL Statute (by virtue of one item that occurred after she had actually been corrected by a Republican Judge). She did indeed violate FL Statute. Let's keep this discussion right on point to my original point, which is: she violated a FL Statute and the Republican Judge corrected her for doing so (as I have stated above). Regards, Amy J