Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (2768)	11/20/2000 2:03:57 PM
From: chomolungma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE WHAT THAT FORCE IS without further inspection. Golly gee Batman, do you think you could hazard a guess? Let's see, there's the Bermuda Triangle nearby, or maybe vote fraud. I'll get back to you on the probabilities of each.

To: TraderGreg who wrote (2768)	11/20/2000 8:05:37 PM
From: Vendit™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

In addition to your theory I suggest that it is highly likely now that the (newest numbers) 1,100 military votes will also be counted which were disqualified because of no postmark......the military in many cases does not postmark mail. Bush carried 63% of the allowed military votes so it would be expected that he would have a net gain in overall newly allowed votes of 246 votes bringing his new totals to 1179. Im not factoring in any other votes as Im not sure what else may be allowed to be added to the totals, recounts ect.