Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (1556)	11/20/2000 2:49:08 PM
From: MasonS	Respond to of 3887

I am watching...

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (1556)	11/20/2000 2:51:53 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3887

Does it seem that Boise is asking for the court to determine intent. Is that legal in your mind?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (1556)	11/21/2000 8:46:38 AM
From: lml	Respond to of 3887

Duke: Welcome to this non-stock thread. I caught Boies's argument before the Florida Supreme Court, and IMHO, he did not do as well as the media pundits immediately projected. Most think because of the MSFT antitrust case, he walks on water; he don't. IMHO, he's a little bit unfamiliar with ALL the issues at play. I find quite surprising the immediate points the media scored for the Democratic lawyers based SOLELY upon the line of questioning, meaning intensity, given the Republican team compared to the Democratic team, and conclude the Court was leaning against Republicans and toward the Democratic argument. I happen to disagree. Just because the justices interrogate to a greater the degree the ISSUES presented and ARGUED by the Republican does not mean a priori that the Court is going to rule against the Republican position. The bottom line is some of these media legal pundits don't know kaka. No one knows what the Court will do, but we shall soon see.