SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EARTHLINK (ELNK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarkie who wrote (2233)12/7/2000 6:24:39 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2553
 
From Forbes.com:

forbes.com

ISPs In DSL Squeeze
David Simons, Forbes.com, 12.07.00, 12:01 AM ET

It would seem that broadband is just what Internet service providers
(ISPs) need to counter slowing growth of dial-up subscriptions. And
with ISP access to cable still a political football, telephone-based
digital subscriber line, or DSL, is the main option.

Certainly the statistics and forecasts are glowing. DSL lines tripled to
2 million in 2000 and are projected to grow 50% annually to 10 million
by 2004. The problem for ISPs is that making money from DSL isn't
nearly as clear.

EarthLink's (nasdaq: ELNK) Chief Financial Officer Lee Adrian said
in the company's third-quarter earnings report conference call that
EarthLink's "margins will be muddied by the increasing proportion of
broadband business." Translation: Though today's $39.95 price for
DSL is double the $19.95 standard for dial-up, there's no net gain for
the ISP. The bulk rate cost of DSL lines for the largest ISPs is 50%
greater than for dial-up lines. Smaller ISPs pay much more. And the
DSL bite is increased by greater demand on operations and tech
support.

The silver lining is that today's demand for DSL is from early adopters
and requires little marketing expense. In addition, everyone in the ISP
business agrees that DSL prices will follow the downward cost curve
of dial-up. But two other problems are much tougher.

The Telco Threat

The local telcos, which wholesale DSL to ISPs, also sell it directly to
consumers. But unlike long-distance, which can be chosen
independently of local service, retail telco DSL service is bundled with
Internet access and e-mail. Only USWest customers can buy DSL
alone (for $19.95 per month) and hook up to any ISP that supports it.
Internet subscribers who live everywhere but Colorado and the
Northwest must choose between buying access and e-mail from the
telco or from their ISP.

The telcos' dismal track record at marketing dial-up access--they have
less than 5% market share--would seem to make competition from
them unimportant. The telcos never got excited about selling dial-up
access, especially because the opportunity was dwarfed by the far
more profitable demand for second phone lines at online households.

But the telcos got religion about DSL. Cable modem service and
telephone-based competitive local access providers posed the first
serious threat to their dominance. So the local telcos have been
stepping up DSL marketing, and though ISPs aren't the competitive
target, they are squarely in the line of fire.

In September, Verizon Communications (nyse: VZ) and SBC (nyse:
SBC), which account for two-thirds of U.S. phone lines, cut their
residential DSL price from $49.95 to $39.95, with no installation and
equipment fees. Last month EarthLink began a promotion that
matches the telco's monthly price but charges a non-refundable $99
setup.

My last two local phone bills from Verizon included a promotion
offering a perpetual $5 per month credit on $39.95 DSL to customers
who have one of four premium local calling packages that start at
$17.99 per month. I'd guess that a high percentage of the households
willing to pay $39.95 for DSL already subscribe to those telephone
plans. Verizon also offers a 30-day money back guarantee, or the first
month free if signup is done online. Those deals, backed by TV
advertising, target a new volley of cable modem deals, such as Time
Warner (nyse: TWX) systems offering Road Runner service with the
first month and the sixth month free.

Mike Lunsford, EarthLink's senior vice president of broadband,
emphasizes that price is just a part of the equation. He points to
EarthLink's award-winning customer support and features such as
access to EarthLink's national dial-up network while travelling. Fair
enough. But Lunsford also agrees with widespread estimates that the
local telcos are grabbing up to 70% of residential DSL access
account subscriptions. Telcos won't break out their DSL sales reports
by wholesale and retail. Prior to the advent of DSL, the telcos
captured only a sliver of Internet accounts. So it seems that most of
the DSL subscribers gained by telcos are coming from ISPs.

The Somewhat Good News

Lunsford and other ISP executives say the real leverage in DSL is that
users greatly increase time spent online, enhancing the opportunity
for advertising and commerce. Sounds great. Yet ISP executives are
squishy about the types of services, revenue, and business models.
All agree that file downloads such as Napster are the clear
application leaders today, and that development of broadband content
such as streaming video remains foggy. Even less clear is how ISPs
will claim a piece of the action.

The good news is that the timeline for figuring out how to make money
from DSL isn't as tight as the broadband hype suggests. EarthLink's
Lunsford said that early results of his company's $39.95 promotion
show a sign-up rate about the same as at $49.95. That reflects the
relative price insensitivity of early adopters. But it also says that
$39.95 isn't low enough to attract the mainstream market.

That explains why Juno (nasdaq: JWEB), which offers DSL at
$49.95, doesn't feel compelled to match the telcos' new $39.95 price
point. President Charles Ardai says that Juno customers, whom he
describes as solidly mainstream, "aren't clamoring for DSL." Juno is
focused on converting its 7.5 million ad-supported free e-mail and
Web access dial-up accounts to a $9.95 per month service that offers
less advertising, more access numbers, and live customer support.
Ardai thinks that the inflection point for mass market pricing and
adoption of DSL is at least two years away.

America Online (nyse: AOL) seems to agree. There's been little
follow-through on DSL resale pacts inked with Verizon and SBC in
early 1999, even though Time Warner cable passes just 20% of U.S.
households. Instead, AOL has focused on narrowband enhancements
to its online service delivered via cellular, paging and television.
Actions do speak louder than words.