Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (1576)	11/20/2000 3:38:56 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

you are not kidding there, seems she was asking questions(if that is what they were) that she would not give him time to answer...that is clear...

To: Carolyn who wrote (1576)	11/20/2000 3:40:33 PM
From: Sarkie	Respond to of 3887

I have to agree with that.

To: Carolyn who wrote (1576)	11/20/2000 3:51:57 PM
From: Bridge Player	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3887

IMO the Bush lawyers appear unprepared and argumentative. And that may be why the market is tanking again. No excuse for that. BP

To: Carolyn who wrote (1576)	11/21/2000 8:54:58 AM
From: lml	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

I found J. Pariente's comments from the bench, her opinion that is, regarding actions by the Secretary of State and issue of the hand count in her home county of Palm Beach quite surprising and irregular for a Supreme Court justice. The hearing was one a forum for oral arguments BY THE PARTIES to the COURT, not by the COURT to the PARTIES. One cannot help but question J. Pariente's objectivity to distinguish the limited issues before the Court, from her own inherent bias to the circumstances leading up to the hearing. On point, what the Secretary of State did or did not do initially (her action to summarily reject all untimely ballots) , prior to J. Lewis's ruling, is a question of fact NOT BEFORE the Court. While one can certainly argue her bias at the trial court level, it is most certainly not an issue for the Supreme Court to address in this hearing. Without going on much further, I found her comments to Klock extremely un-justice like.