SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: moby_dick who wrote (82902)11/20/2000 6:11:15 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I in no way defended Nixon's Watergate behavior. I corrected you on a point of history.



To: moby_dick who wrote (82902)11/20/2000 6:12:11 PM
From: JamesB  Respond to of 769670
 
I may have missed it, and if so I apologize, but I did not see anyone defending Nixon's actions relative to Watergate. What he did AFTER it came to his attention is indefensible. The point was that history, and examination of the facts does not show that it was done on his order, or even with his knowledge.



To: moby_dick who wrote (82902)11/20/2000 6:19:09 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Thanks, Moby, I needed that<VBG>......I can't think that DMA, for example, meant much more than that all that is fairly sure is that Nixon was involved in the cover up. He did authorize the Plumbers, and that puts him closer to responsibility for the break-in, but it remains possible that he did not have a role in that. Suspicion might be reasonable, but that is not proof. Still, one must take care, when discussing Nixon, not to get tainted.......


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News