Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: exhon2004 who wrote (118705)	11/21/2000 7:46:24 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Greg, re: deceit and treachery and noble and honest I was pulling your leg when I wrote the "noble and honest" BS. I think both sides have acted purely out of self interest in this mess, with no regard for the country or the integrity of the system. But I believe throwing "deciet and treachery" stones from either side is a glass house thing. WSJ articles can be neutral, their editorials are to the far right of Rush Limbaugh. Totally hypothetical: If there was a new vote today, and the selection was Bush, Gore or Clinton, who do you think would get the most votes. My bet would be on Clinton. And my guess is that whoever wins this election, the other party will get the House and Senate in two years, and probably the Presidency in four years. And if Bush wins, we could very well get the other Clinton next time around. I vote for both Reps and Dems for local and state offices, this year the Presidency was a coin flip. If I had it to do again, I wouldn't vote for either candidate, but they would probably find a dimple and count it for one or the other anyway. John