Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (39723)	11/21/2000 2:21:06 PM
From: Follies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

then there MIGHT be a possible appeal to the US Supreme Court IF and ONLY IF a federal or constitutional issue is involved. Would changing the rules of an election after the vote constitute such an issue. I would hope that our constitution provides for fair and open elections and that a state could not supercede.

To: Ilaine who wrote (39723)	11/21/2000 5:26:21 PM
From: Tom M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

CB <<if...goes beyond strictly interpreting the law>> Sounds like plain English to me - thanks. Problem is this administration's "interpretation", as usual. How can we get justice when they can arbitrarily choose how to interpret anything till it fits their needs. Guess I missed my ballot question on whether we wanted to abandon the constitution and democracy as we've lived it. Wonder how we'd do if we held the entire election over at this point - with one vote per soc sec #...