SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (118742)11/21/2000 2:59:08 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
Joe,
RE:"Joe......please pass along to Diamond Jim and Jim McMinnis that they are selectively reading their Wall St. Journals.....I heard last evening that the WSJ published that two repub counties already did manual recounts..... Also, why didn't Bush ask for recounts in repub counties and why didn't he accept Gore's offer to manually recount the whole state......"

Ask the guy why he can't even spell my name right...

Jim



To: Joe NYC who wrote (118742)11/21/2000 3:05:30 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Joe and Joe,

re: "Also, why didn't Bush ask for recounts in repub counties and why didn't he accept Gore's offer to manually recount the whole state......"

I suspect Bush is afraid that he might lose with a statewide recount, and Gore seems to want one, which reinforces that. The other thing could be that if they get into a statewide recount, it could delay the certification beyond the deadline for electors. If it played out that the EC voted without the Florida electors, then Gore would win with the current elector lead (Not majority, I know there is a constitutional debate on this, but it is one of the scenarios). So it could benefit Gore to delay, if he could keep things undecided past the December 12th elector deadline.

John