Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (39763)	11/21/2000 3:18:12 PM
From: Follies	Respond to of 436258

But the argument against that would be that the Florida Supreme Court isn't changing the law, it is interpreting the law. fine line. Yesterday one of the judges posed a hypothetical question to one of Bushs lawyers, something ilke "If the canvasing board receives ballots which are completed correctly (or successfully) and the chad is dimpled, is the board required to count it?" The obvious answer was that the instruction ballot clearly states "take care that the chad is removed" so those ballots were not successfully completed by the standards set forth in the instruction ballot and the question is ambiguous. The lawyer gave some mealy mouth reply.