SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (118764)11/21/2000 8:23:55 PM
From: ratan lal  Respond to of 186894
 
The thing that seems to be happening now, IMHO, is the two sides are setting things up for an appeal if they lose. Probably the US Supreme's.

This is a state matter. I dont think the Supreme court will hear it unless they somehow show that the voters constitutional rights have been violated.



To: Road Walker who wrote (118764)11/21/2000 9:03:11 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 186894
 
John,

We devine the voter's intent based on the depth of the dimple? <g>

Chris Mathews had an interesting theory on the dimples. He said that a dimple may mean that the voter placed the punching instrument over the hole of the candidate, and just couldn't bring himself to push it threw. In this, according to Mathews, a dimple may be a clear indication of the voters intention not to vote for the candidate. <g>

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News