Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (118768)	11/21/2000 6:58:09 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Since they are already counted, I presume the dispute is coming from Gore." Sure they are. The thing is, that any irregularities in the process of these absentee ballots were not the problem of the voters themselves... Jim

To: ratan lal who wrote (118768)	11/22/2000 1:15:35 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ratan Re: "Were these received by Republican party which then forwarded them to the proper vote receiving authority? The applications were received by the elections supervisor's office in Seminole county. Re: "If so, how did the vote receving authority know that the info was filled in after the signature?" The Elections Supervisor allowed Republican representatives to alter the applications. Re: "if not, then how could the republicans get their hands on the votes already cast?" The alteration was on the otherwise invalid applications for a ballot, not on the ballot itself. Florida law requires that the voter or a member of their immediate family provide the application information.