SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Douglas who wrote (118779)11/21/2000 8:53:56 PM
From: Barry Grossman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Robert,

I did it myself once.

Sometimes one doesn't like either choice and the choice becomes neither. I remember having that choice myself when I voted for the first time. I couldn't stomach voting for LBJ and at the time thought Goldwater was way too far to the right for my taste. So, I cast a vote in that election for every office and issue - EXCEPT for the presidency.

Barry



To: Robert Douglas who wrote (118779)11/21/2000 11:06:45 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Respond to of 186894
 
Sorry to inform you, but you are dead wrong. They are called protest votes and they average about 2% of all ballots cast. This is a well-known pattern.

I heard the same thing but I recall .5%. Either way, a significant number of votes are valid non vote "protest" votes.

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: Robert Douglas who wrote (118779)11/22/2000 12:23:21 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: They are called protest votes and they average about 2% of all ballots cast.

Protestors could vote for Nader, Buchanan, or several other candidates. Or stay home.

The number of people who bothered to vote, pressed hard enough on one candidates chad to indent it, but meant to not vote has got to be limited to about 3 people in the whole state.

Dan