SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (125)11/22/2000 1:28:10 AM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 644
 
Hmm. And I heard that ballots were being sent to Israel late to try to find a post office willing to backdate postmark dates. In reality I suspect that fears of fraud with late absentee votes were probably overstated on both sides because there weren't an expectedly high number of late ballots. Nevertheless the possibility of fraud in this area is particularly high, which is why these ballots should not be counted unless it is very clear that they were postmarked on time, and ballots with no postmark should definitely not be counted.

Carl



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (125)11/22/2000 8:35:32 AM
From: Bosco  Respond to of 644
 
<ot>Hi Zeev - yes, I read that most local election officials have actually made allowance of oversea ballots if they only lack a postmark. Most of the rejections are of more serious nature, like the lack of addresses or witness etc

best, Bosco


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News